Intelligent Trading Foundation (ITF) is no longer in a position to continue active development of our full suite of products. However, our products will remain online and available for our users as long as possible. See more information here.
The spotlight is on Bitcoin in 2019, with analysts seeing more and more institutional investment entering or showing interest in the crypto markets. This could be in part because it was recently revealed that the multi-billion dollar endowments of Yale, Harvard,Stanford, and MIT have all invested in cryptocurrencies.
Analyst speculation has it that the herd mentality of institutions will trigger a chain reaction, bringing even more institutional investors into the crypto-space.
But why all the attention now? And especially after the unexpectedly bearish market of late-2018?
To answer these questions, let’s trace Bitcoin from the beginning, its inception, to present day and modern portfolio management strategies.
Let’s keep this simple. Bitcoin (BTC) is a digital currency, distributed and used electronically.
Because bitcoin operates on a decentralized peer-to-peer (P2P) network, there is no single institution in control.
It can never be printed, and there is a limit of 21 million bitcoin that can ever be created.
Bitcoin was first introduced to the world by an anonymous programmer (or a group of programmers) as an open-source software. While its creation is attributed to an alias known to the world as Satoshi Nakamoto, a lot of controversy remains around his/her/their identity.
There has been a lot of speculation and rumor, but to this day there is no concrete evidence to link Satoshi to any one person. Estimates are that Satoshi owns around 1 million bitcoin, which as of the time of writing (April 2019) would be worth approximately 5.5 billion US.
In mid-2010, “Satoshi” disappeared entirely and passed Bitcoin over to a few prominent members of the BTC community, naming Gavin Andersen as lead developer. It was also around this time when, on 22 May, bitcoin was used in its first purchase, proving the nascent cryptocurrency’s potential as a means of payment.
Before 2010, mostly only techies and hobbyists were aware of bitcoin. But this all changed after one, not-so-simple pizza order was posted to the bitcointalk forum.
Laszlo Hanyecz, a Florida-based programmer working for the online retail company GoRuck, was just hungry. And he had some bitcoin.
At the time, 10,000 BTC was worth approximately $30 US. (Fast-forward to present day, and that bitcoin would now be worth a staggering $55+ million, as of April 2019.)
Jeremy Sturdivant, also known as “Jercos” on the bitcointalk forum, saw Laszlo’s post and took him up on the offer. After receiving his bitcoin, he called in two large Papa John’s pizzas to be delivered to Laszlo’s address, and the rest was history.
From that day forward, May 22 became known as Bitcoin Pizza Day. There’s now even a Twitter account dedicated solely to the Bitcoin Pizza. It’s updated daily to show you the current value of those two pizzas, commemorating the first real price valuation of the digital currency.
After Satoshi detached himself from the project, Gavin Andersen, the newly appointed lead developer, focused on further decentralization. He wanted Bitcoin to continue autonomously and independent from any particular corporation or government, even if, in his own words, he "would get hit by a bus".
In theory, the developers would only be working for their users. While the development team could decide what new features to implement, it was the users who would decide whether or not to run a particular version of the Bitcoin software.
For many, the main advantage to Bitcoin was its independence from world governments, banks, and corporations. Its intention was to put the user-base in control, and likewise make it so that no single entity could interfere with BTC transactions, impose additional transaction fees, reverse payments, or freeze people’s funds.
And it was also transparent thanks to its distributed public ledger, the blockchain.
The blockchain is a shared public ledger. Think of it like a bank ledger that anybody can view. It contains every transaction ever processed on the network, with digital “records” of transactions being combined into a “chain” of “blocks”.
With it being a public ledger, any mistakes or attempts at fraud can be easily detected and then corrected by anybody. This public ledger protects the network particularly against the ‘double-spend problem’ to guarantee there will be no counterfeit or fraudulent BTC transactions.
Users have their own BTC wallets, and these validate every transaction. Digital signatures secure each, with signatures corresponding to the sending addresses.
The verification process utilizes a “proof-of-work” consensus mechanism and “mining” to create every block of the ledger. Mining is used to verify every transaction, using computer processing time to protect the network from various attack vectors.
For Satoshi, Bitcoin had to be independent from any governing authorities. Along this backdrop, he designed the network so that every individual, business, or even machine involved in the verification/mining process became part of the massive network. This means that even if one part of the network experiences problems, the digital currency will keep moving.
Often confused as an “anonymous network” and criticized by regulatory authorities for its potential to facilitate nefarious and criminal activity, the truth about Bitcoin is that it’s really a pseudonymous network.
While users do not need to connect their wallet to any identifying information, they usually do when buying, selling, or trading their BTC. Given, it can be difficult to reveal the identity of wallet-users, but it is not impossible.
There are government agencies and chain analysis firms the world over, actively unmasking users over time. What is more, if you did want to reveal your identity and transaction history, it’s easily done by simply sharing your wallet address.
Every single transaction is stored on the network. If your BTC wallet address were ever identified or made public, carefully studying the blockchain’s ledger could reveal how much money you hold in your wallet, and what transactions you’ve made.
It is possible for users to remain largely anonymous, but only if they take extra measures to do so. This requires the use of special wallets, or using multiple BTC addresses for transactions. But again, as chain analysis firms advance, this anonymity cannot be guaranteed forever.
The public ledger is, for the most part, immutable and unchanging. Because of the network’s proof-of-work protocol, it is nearly impossible to change the ledger without it being easily noticed and repaired.
This means that after you send bitcoin, there is no way to get that bitcoin back without the recipient sending your BTC back to you directly. The reception of the payment is guaranteed, so nobody can scam you by claiming they never got the money. When it’s sent, it is sent.
There are a number of positive attributes to this network, but let’s simplify the list and look at the most noteworthy.
Let’s now look to the other side of the coin and outline some the network’s most prominent weaknesses:
To find some answers to this question, let’s look back to Yale University. A recent study conducted and published by Yale economist Aleh Tsyvinski and Yukun Liu has examined the risk-return tradeoff of adding cryptocurrencies (in this case: Bitcoin, Ripple, and Ethereum) to a portfolio.
Their paper, "Risks and Returns of Cryptocurrency" observes the behavior of cryptocurrencies as being distinct from traditional stocks, currencies, and precious metals. The results documented high returns but with a lot of volatility.
They analyzed their crypto assets by applying the Sharpe Ratio, which measures the performance of an asset by adjusting for its degree of risk.
What they found was that in terms of return versus volatility, the Sharpe Ratio of the cryptocurrencies in their portfolio showed “the return is higher than the risk implied by [their] volatility.”
In addition to this, Tsyvinski and Liu summarized their study in a YalesNews Interview, and stated the following:
“If you as an investor believe that Bitcoin will perform as well as it has historically, then you should hold 6% of your portfolio in Bitcoin. If you believe that it will do half as well, you should hold 4%. In all other circumstances, if you think it will do much worse, then you should still hold 1%.”
This makes a sound case for bitcoin investment, especially coming from Yale University, whose multi-billion dollar endowment was invested cryptocurrencies.
Bitcoin has typically shown little to no correlation with the traditional market. This means it can compliment allocation strategies for alternative assets or absolute return, as was pointed out in the Yale study by Tsyvinski and Liu. And with the right management, some bitcoin in a portfolio has been seen to not only improve a portfolio’s overall performance but also to reduce its overall risk.
What it all comes down to is proper portfolio management. It’s important to treat crypto assets as the emerging asset class they are and to not risk more than you can afford to lose. Cryptocurrencies in general are still a hyper-volatile asset class, so you need to manage these assets in your portfolio wisely.
Want to learn more? Don’t forget to download our free eBook on “Investing in Cryptocurrencies” to dive deeper into investment strategies with crypto assets.
Inside, you’ll find extra insights to help you either get started investing or to better manage your portfolio. Read online or download the PDF here for easy access for when you’re offline.
The articles provided by IT Alpha d/b/a Intelligent Trading Foundation (“ITF”) are provided for informational purposes only. This post does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading advice. ITF does not recommend that any specific cryptocurrency should be bought, sold, or held. Digital assets exist in a volatile and high-risk market, and their value can change frequently and without notice. ITF takes no liability for any decision(s) made or action(s) taken by any of our readers. Our articles are not meant to replace independent financial advice, and ITF strongly recommends any purchaser of digital assets, even if such user is experienced and affluent, seek independent financial advice in the content of their own unique circumstances.
Whether you are a seasoned trader or a beginner, our Telegram Bot will do all the grunt work so you can focus on making the most informed trading decisions.